<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Views: Jerusalem at the Apollo Theatre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.visitlondon.com/2010/02/your-views-jerusalem-at-the-apollo-theatre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.visitlondon.com/2010/02/your-views-jerusalem-at-the-apollo-theatre/</link>
	<description>Enjoy the very best of London</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:06:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoe J. Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://blog.visitlondon.com/2010/02/your-views-jerusalem-at-the-apollo-theatre/#comment-5469</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoe J. Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.visitlondon.com/?p=6381#comment-5469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really interesting points, David. I&#039;ve spoken to lots of people about this show, and nearly everyone seems to have something different to say about it. Someone I know thought of it as a &quot;light comedy&quot;; another person thought it was deeply moving, and quite sad...

I can&#039;t say I agree with you on the &quot;compensating charisma&quot; - I thought Johnny had it in spades!

I don&#039;t think Old England was full of derelicts either - but I can see that modern England has some, and I really enjoyed Jez Butterworth&#039;s suggestions that this particular one is tightly bound to our strangely English heritage.

As for the Professor - isn&#039;t he a device? Partly for comedy, partly to voice some of the philosophical, historical aspects of Butterworth&#039;s script?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting points, David. I&#8217;ve spoken to lots of people about this show, and nearly everyone seems to have something different to say about it. Someone I know thought of it as a &#8220;light comedy&#8221;; another person thought it was deeply moving, and quite sad&#8230;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say I agree with you on the &#8220;compensating charisma&#8221; &#8211; I thought Johnny had it in spades!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Old England was full of derelicts either &#8211; but I can see that modern England has some, and I really enjoyed Jez Butterworth&#8217;s suggestions that this particular one is tightly bound to our strangely English heritage.</p>
<p>As for the Professor &#8211; isn&#8217;t he a device? Partly for comedy, partly to voice some of the philosophical, historical aspects of Butterworth&#8217;s script?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Irvin</title>
		<link>http://blog.visitlondon.com/2010/02/your-views-jerusalem-at-the-apollo-theatre/#comment-5452</link>
		<dc:creator>David Irvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.visitlondon.com/?p=6381#comment-5452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Briliant acting by Mark Rylance, very funny First Act. But ultimately the play loses direction and fizzles out. Rooster does not have the stature of a Falstaff, in fact is a very unattractive Lord of Misrule. Fundamentally he is a self-aggrandising failure, sick at heart, morally discredited and short of what might be compensating charisma. This is a hugely entertaining play, but to claim it as anything more is deluded. I don&#039;t think Old England was full of derelicts like this. This does not seem to me to be a morality play. I want my anti-establishment plays to have a more invigorating alternative ! And can someons tell me what is the point of the Professor ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Briliant acting by Mark Rylance, very funny First Act. But ultimately the play loses direction and fizzles out. Rooster does not have the stature of a Falstaff, in fact is a very unattractive Lord of Misrule. Fundamentally he is a self-aggrandising failure, sick at heart, morally discredited and short of what might be compensating charisma. This is a hugely entertaining play, but to claim it as anything more is deluded. I don&#8217;t think Old England was full of derelicts like this. This does not seem to me to be a morality play. I want my anti-establishment plays to have a more invigorating alternative ! And can someons tell me what is the point of the Professor ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://blog.visitlondon.com/2010/02/your-views-jerusalem-at-the-apollo-theatre/#comment-5171</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.visitlondon.com/?p=6381#comment-5171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought it was great, Mackenzie Crook missed a trick not mentioning &quot;Pirates of the Carribean&quot; as one of the floats in the parade though!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was great, Mackenzie Crook missed a trick not mentioning &#8220;Pirates of the Carribean&#8221; as one of the floats in the parade though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 310/313 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: dx9rjq5h30myv.cloudfront.net

 Served from: blog.visitlondon.com @ 2013-05-22 03:40:14 by W3 Total Cache -->